
30:33
Law 58 covers simultaneous leads

32:00
I cannot get any audio

32:45
Does everyone have audio?

33:04
I do

33:05
i have audio

33:10
no audio

33:25
Yes, audio. When start session on Windows, you have to give permission for audio.

33:45
makmputere sure the sound level is on your c

34:59
you have to turn the 'sound' on your computer

36:06
The sound on your computer needs to be on. All participants are currently muted so that only Melody's presentation will be heard.

37:25
I am getting double audio. What is wrong?

38:24
Do you have the meeting on two devices (maybe phone and computer?)

40:49
no only one computer

41:02
If anyone is still having audio issues, check the options from the toolbar by clicking on the options associated with the mute/unmute option at left at tool bar

44:32
What is the most current edition of the laws?

44:41
2017

45:06
Is Duplicate Decisions 2020 more current

45:16
actually 6 as lho can acceot

47:30
Yes Duplicate Decisions 2020 is a revised version

47:52
May the dummy remind the declarer where the lead is if the declarer is reaching for a card from their hand when lead should come from the dummy?

48:01
It is available online at ACBL.org. go to the helpful documents section and there is a link to it there.

49:25
If declarer seems to be leading from the wrong hand, dummy may say something to prevent the irrgularity

50:04
But dummy should not speak unless declarer seems to be about to lead from the wrong hand, but starting to pull a card from his hand, or by apparently starting to call a card from dummy when that is not the correct hand

50:05
Law 42B2 says dummy may try to prevent any irregularity

52:08
Dummy should not routinely tell declarer which hand to lead from -- dummy should only speak when it appears declarer is starting to lead from the wrong hand

52:17
when East has options and West makes a comment, how should the director proceed?

53:23
@Phil -- that should be treated as Unauthorized Information.

53:40
If that side gains an advantage by the comments, the Director can adjust the result

54:19
can count signals be used when minor pen

56:02
As long as the penalty card is handled properly, there is no restriction on what other cards are played.

57:27
Permit me to record

57:40
. Major or Minor Penalty CardA single card below the rank of an honor exposedunintentionally (as in playing two cards to a trick,or in dropping a card accidentally) becomes aminor penalty card. Any card of honor rank, orany card exposed through deliberate play (forexample in leading out of turn, or in revoking andthen correcting), becomes a major penalty card;when one defender has two or more penaltycards, all such cards become major penalty cards.

57:53
The session is being recorded and it will be available to you. An email with the link will be sent out.

59:38
An "honor" card is 10 or higher, so card accidentally exposed which is the 9 or lower is a minor penalty card

01:00:36
The .pdf is also going to be made available after the session

01:04:28
does it not become unauthorized information?

01:04:53
yes, UI is now available and has to be considered for future bids

01:06:41
Bidding box regulations say touching or nearly touching the table (face up)

01:07:07
After a bidding card is shown but not played and the bidder chooses to change it, will there be lead penalties?

01:07:27
but aren't those a lapse of concentration?

01:08:39
@Adam -- no specific lead restrictions, but there is Unauthorized Information which partner is not allowed to take advantage of

01:08:53
If the player can legally change the call, there is unauthorized information. The play continues, but if the opponents feel the UI impacted the outcome, the director will review everything and determine if the result should be adjusted

01:11:58
yes

01:11:58
for surew

01:11:59
yes

01:11:59
YES!

01:11:59
yes

01:12:00
yes

01:12:00
yes

01:12:00
yes

01:12:01
Yes

01:12:01
yes

01:12:02
yes

01:12:02
no

01:12:02
yes

01:12:03
yes

01:12:03
yes

01:12:03
yes

01:12:03
yes

01:12:04
yes

01:12:04
Yes

01:12:04
yes

01:12:04
tes

01:12:05
yes

01:12:05
yes

01:12:06
yes

01:12:06
yes

01:12:06
yes

01:12:06
no

01:12:06
yes

01:12:07
yes

01:12:07
yes

01:12:07
yes

01:12:07
yes

01:12:08
yes

01:12:08
yes

01:12:08
yes

01:12:08
Yes

01:12:08
this year

01:12:08
yes

01:12:09
yes

01:12:09
yes

01:12:09
yes

01:12:10
yes

01:12:10
yes

01:12:10
no

01:12:10
yes

01:12:11
yes

01:12:12
yes

01:12:12
yes

01:12:12
yes

01:12:13
yes

01:12:13
yes

01:12:14
Yes

01:12:14
yes

01:12:15
yes

01:12:15
Yes

01:12:15
yes

01:12:16
yes

01:12:17
Yes

01:12:18
Yes

01:12:18
Yes

01:12:29
es

01:12:31
Yes

01:13:21
no

01:13:23
not this year

01:13:24
no

01:13:25
no

01:13:25
no

01:13:26
no

01:13:26
no

01:13:26
No

01:13:26
no

01:13:27
no

01:13:27
yes

01:13:27
no

01:13:27
No

01:13:27
no

01:13:27
no

01:13:28
no

01:13:28
no

01:13:28
NO

01:13:28
no

01:13:28
no

01:13:28
no

01:13:28
no

01:13:29
no

01:13:29
No

01:13:29
no

01:13:29
no

01:13:29
no

01:13:30
no

01:13:30
no

01:13:30
no

01:13:30
no

01:13:30
no

01:13:31
YES

01:13:31
yes

01:13:31
No

01:13:31
yes

01:13:31
no

01:13:31
no

01:13:32
no

01:13:32
yes

01:13:32
no

01:13:33
no

01:13:33
no

01:13:33
no

01:13:34
no

01:13:34
no

01:13:34
no

01:13:34
Yes

01:13:39
no

01:13:42
no

01:13:55
No

01:14:19
no

01:14:19
no

01:14:20
yes

01:14:21
no

01:14:22
No

01:14:22
no

01:14:22
yes

01:14:22
yes

01:14:23
yes

01:14:23
yes

01:14:24
yes

01:14:24
yes

01:14:24
yes

01:14:24
no

01:14:25
no

01:14:25
no

01:14:25
yes

01:14:25
no

01:14:25
no

01:14:26
yes

01:14:26
no

01:14:26
yes

01:14:26
No

01:14:26
i wish

01:14:26
no

01:14:26
no

01:14:27
yes

01:14:27
yes

01:14:27
no

01:14:27
no

01:14:27
yes

01:14:27
no

01:14:27
yes

01:14:28
no

01:14:28
no

01:14:29
yes

01:14:29
yes

01:14:30
yes

01:14:30
yes

01:14:32
yes

01:14:32
no

01:14:32
yes

01:14:32
yes

01:14:32
No

01:14:36
No

01:14:37
yes

01:14:40
yes

01:14:44
no

01:14:45
No

01:15:51
so is "getting ahead of yourself" not a loss of concentration?

01:16:03
and therefore not allowed to be changed?

01:16:19
loss of concentration should not be allowed to change

01:16:38
Yes, "getting ahead of yourself" is a loss of concentration and a change should not be allowed

01:16:43
still confused on what is correct ruling when King led to Ace on last example

01:16:43
When Melody calls for a break, make sure you don't log out of Zoom. We are maxed out and if you leave you may not be able to get back in! So keep zoom going :)

01:16:51
When a declarer "gets ahead of himself" isn't that a loss of concentration?

01:17:45
what about revokes from dummy?

01:18:05
She may get to revoke from dummy, if not please ask again :)

01:18:20
loss of concentration results in no change to what declarer called for

01:19:06
yes

01:19:20
In the example hand from before, declarer should be required to play the A over the K if the director determines he "got ahead of himself" or lost concentration

01:20:03
yes

01:20:07
yes

01:20:08
yes

01:20:08
tes

01:20:09
yes

01:20:11
yes

01:20:12
yes

01:20:12
yes

01:20:13
no

01:20:14
yes

01:20:15
yes

01:20:15
yes

01:20:16
yes

01:20:16
yes

01:20:18
yrd

01:20:19
Yes

01:20:20
!

01:20:21
yes

01:20:55
not bridge

01:20:59
ouch

01:21:09
but trick is now not trumped

01:21:23
don't revoke

01:21:34
Law 62C

01:21:37
but revoking side got the advantage

01:22:13
True, the trick is no longer trumped, but the opponent (in this case dummy's hand) did not change their card so the offending side cannot change theirs

01:22:35
got it my bad

01:24:09
BTW, if you have questions about Rulings, you can always send them to Rulings@ACBL.org

01:24:24
Equity also always has to come into play, no? In a situation where a revoke allows the offending side to score a bunch of tricks (in say NT) they would not have otherwise won?

01:25:24
When they send this out…will it be only a video or will you send a copy of the “slides”? thanks

01:26:10
A link to the pdf will also be available

01:26:31
Thanks!!

01:27:19
Adj if more than one/two trick effect?

01:28:08
if the revoke resulted in the declarer (for example) was unable to run a long suit, adjustments would be made

01:28:15
Melody is addressing this now

01:31:44
If defender did not play trump when they were called and then plays a trump to win a trick and wins 3 more trcks before revolk is caught how many tricks are they penalize

01:32:14
Here we go!!!!!

01:34:07
es

01:34:09
yes

01:34:10
Maggi, we need to look at the hand to determine what would have happened without the revoke. The offender didn't win the trick of the revoke but he did win subsequent tricks so there is at least a one trick penalty.

01:34:11
yes

01:34:12
no

01:34:13
no

01:34:14
yes

01:34:14
yes

01:34:15
no

01:34:16
yes

01:34:19
yes

01:34:19
yes

01:34:20
yes

01:34:20
no

01:34:20
no

01:34:21
yes

01:34:21
yes

01:34:21
yes

01:34:21
no

01:34:21
yes

01:34:21
yes

01:34:21
y

01:34:21
yes

01:34:22
no

01:34:22
yes

01:34:22
no

01:34:22
yes

01:34:23
yes

01:34:24
Yes

01:34:25
yes

01:34:25
yes

01:34:25
yes

01:34:25
yes

01:34:25
no

01:34:25
yes

01:34:26
yes

01:34:27
no

01:34:27
yes

01:34:27
yes

01:34:27
no

01:34:29
yes

01:34:30
yes

01:34:30
yes

01:34:33
yes

01:34:35
yes

01:34:51
if shows an opening, yes

01:34:55
@Maggi -- sounds like the revoke was corrected, so no trick penalty. There would be a penalty card however. If the revoke was established, that's different

01:35:20
no

01:35:21
no

01:35:21
no

01:35:22
no

01:35:22
no

01:35:23
no

01:35:23
no

01:35:23
no

01:35:24
mo

01:35:25
yes

01:35:25
no

01:35:26
yes

01:35:26
no

01:35:26
no

01:35:26
no

01:35:27
no

01:35:28
no

01:35:28
no

01:35:28
no

01:35:28
no

01:35:29
no

01:35:29
no

01:35:29
no

01:35:30
yes

01:35:30
no

01:35:31
yes

01:35:32
yes

01:35:43
yes

01:35:44
yes

01:36:18
some pairs show opener with over call

01:36:24
no

01:36:28
no

01:36:38
no

01:36:41
no

01:36:50
no

01:36:57
no

01:37:04
If an overcall guarantees an opening hand in their partnership agreements, 1H would be allowed in 2nd eample

01:37:55
no

01:38:05
no

01:38:07
no

01:38:09
no

01:38:10
no

01:38:10
no

01:38:11
no

01:38:11
yes

01:38:11
I'm lost on the 1H overcall not being allowed.

01:38:12
no

01:38:13
no

01:38:16
NO

01:38:48
who is barred?

01:38:49
can s change her bid?

01:38:49
is S still allows

01:38:51
when?

01:38:54
yes

01:38:57
yes

01:38:58
yes

01:39:00
yes

01:39:01
yes

01:39:02
yes

01:39:02
yes

01:39:03
yes

01:39:04
yes

01:39:04
yes

01:39:04
yes

01:39:05
yes

01:39:05
yes

01:39:05
yes

01:39:05
yes

01:39:06
yes

01:39:06
yes

01:39:06
yes

01:39:07
yes

01:39:07
yes

01:39:07
yes

01:39:07
yes

01:39:08
yes

01:39:08
yes

01:39:08
yes

01:39:09
yes

01:39:09
The 1H overcall typically does not promise an opening hand. So it is not considered comperable

01:39:10
yes

01:39:54
no

01:39:57
No

01:39:58
no

01:40:00
no

01:40:02
yes

01:40:03
no

01:40:04
depends

01:40:05
no

01:40:06
yes

01:40:06
yes

01:40:06
yes

01:40:06
no

01:40:08
depends on system

01:40:08
no

01:40:09
no

01:40:09
no

01:40:09
yes

01:40:10
depends

01:40:10
no

01:40:10
yes

01:40:10
Is it a preempt??

01:40:11
yes

01:40:11
depends

01:40:13
what does it mean now?

01:40:13
no

01:40:15
not quite

01:40:15
y

01:40:15
no

01:40:16
yes

01:40:16
yes

01:40:17
yes

01:40:17
no not if it shows just spades

01:40:18
depends

01:40:21
no

01:40:23
No

01:40:23
no

01:40:23
no

01:40:25
no

01:40:26
what is partnership agreement?

01:40:26
no

01:40:26
yes

01:40:26
yes

01:40:26
no

01:40:27
no

01:40:27
no

01:40:28
no

01:40:28
no

01:40:29
ask

01:40:57
3S no

01:40:57
2H would be comparable?

01:41:08
missed the minor - NO

01:41:20
no

01:41:27
No

01:41:32
no

01:41:50
I suppose X

01:42:35
On example, 1D-P-1H, where 1H is deemed not comparable. Responder can make any call he wishes (including 1H,) but if he does not make a comparable call, his partner must pass one time

01:42:56
yes

01:42:56
no

01:42:57
yes

01:42:58
yes

01:42:59
yes

01:43:00
yes

01:43:00
yes

01:43:00
yes

01:43:00
no

01:43:01
yes

01:43:01
yes

01:43:01
no

01:43:02
no

01:43:03
yes

01:43:04
no

01:43:04
no

01:43:05
yes

01:43:07
no

01:43:07
no

01:43:10
no

01:43:11
no

01:43:11
no

01:43:11
no

01:43:11
no

01:43:11
yes

01:43:12
no

01:43:14
no

01:43:14
yes

01:43:14
ues

01:43:15
no

01:43:16
yes

01:43:16
no

01:43:17
yes

01:43:17
no

01:43:17
yes

01:43:18
no

01:43:19
no

01:43:20
no

01:43:21
no

01:43:21
yes

01:43:22
no

01:43:23
no

01:43:25
no

01:43:26
no

01:43:27
no

01:43:27
yes

01:43:27
no

01:43:29
no

01:43:29
no

01:43:30
no

01:43:30
ho

01:43:32
no

01:43:32
ALL YES

01:43:32
no

01:43:33
yes

01:43:34
no

01:43:34
yes

01:43:39
no

01:44:21
y

01:44:22
yes

01:44:22
yes

01:44:26
yes

01:44:28
yes

01:44:31
y

01:46:03
no

01:46:05
2D out of turn showing 5+H & 4S = Flannery. Withdrawn. Now LHO opens 1S. 2H is a subset? Shows 5+H and an opening bid...

01:46:06
no

01:46:06
n

01:46:07
no

01:46:09
no

01:46:09
no

01:46:10
no

01:46:10
no

01:46:11
no

01:46:12
no

01:46:12
n

01:46:13
no

01:46:14
no

01:46:14
no

01:46:14
no

01:46:15
no

01:46:16
no

01:46:17
no

01:46:17
no and no

01:46:18
no

01:46:18
no

01:46:20
no

01:46:28
no

01:47:05
yes

01:47:05
yes

01:47:07
yes

01:47:07
yes

01:47:07
yes

01:47:08
yes

01:47:09
yes

01:47:10
yes

01:47:11
no

01:47:11
yes

01:47:12
y

01:47:14
n

01:47:16
yes

01:47:17
yes

01:47:17
y

01:47:18
yes

01:47:18
y

01:47:19
yes

01:47:19
yes

01:47:23
lack of confidence

01:47:23
if it shows a weak 2 in spades

01:48:08
yes

01:48:08
no

01:48:09
yes

01:48:10
yes

01:48:10
yes

01:48:10
yes

01:48:11
y

01:48:11
yes

01:48:12
yes

01:48:12
yes

01:48:12
yes

01:48:12
y

01:48:13
yes

01:48:14
yes

01:48:14
y

01:48:14
yes

01:48:15
yes

01:48:15
yes

01:48:16
y

01:48:17
yes

01:48:17
yes

01:48:17
yes

01:48:18
yes

01:48:19
y

01:48:19
yes

01:48:20
no

01:48:20
yes

01:48:21
yes

01:48:21
yes

01:48:21
yes

01:48:21
yes

01:48:21
y

01:48:22
yes

01:48:22
yes

01:48:22
yes

01:48:23
yes

01:48:23
yes

01:48:23
y

01:48:24
yes

01:48:24
yes

01:48:24
yes

01:48:24
yes

01:48:24
yes

01:48:25
Yes and yes

01:48:28
no

01:48:28
no

01:48:28
no

01:48:29
no

01:48:29
n

01:48:29
no

01:48:29
yes

01:48:29
?

01:48:31
n

01:48:31
no

01:48:32
no

01:48:33
noyes

01:48:33
n

01:48:34
n

01:48:36
playing 2/1?

01:48:37
no

01:48:37
depends

01:48:43
y y y

01:48:44
2/1? No. Else, yes

01:48:49
no

01:49:28
2C could be Drury

01:49:44
Can't be drury -- they are not a passed hand

01:49:54
Remember the Pass out of rotation does not count

01:49:57
Not by an unpassed hand.

01:49:59
2/1 would 1NT be comp

01:50:00
It's as if that did not occur

01:50:23
If 1NT response is forcing and UNLIMITED, it is not comparable

01:50:24
yes

01:50:27
yes

01:50:28
y

01:50:28
yes

01:50:29
yes

01:50:29
yes

01:50:29
yes

01:50:30
YES

01:50:30
y

01:50:31
y

01:50:31
y

01:50:32
yes

01:50:32
no

01:50:32
yes

01:50:32
yes

01:50:33
yes

01:50:33
yes

01:50:34
yes

01:50:34
yes

01:50:34
yes, even if puppet

01:50:35
yes

01:50:36
y

01:50:36
yes

01:50:37
yes

01:50:38
No if 2/1, since it is an unlimited bid

01:50:40
yes

01:50:43
If 1NT has an upper masterpoint limit (for example it is limited to 11 HCPs, it would be allowed

01:50:44
yes

01:50:48
unless they play puppet

01:50:49
still ok

01:50:49
still yes

01:50:52
yes

01:50:53
puppet = close enough

01:50:53
depends

01:50:53
yes

01:50:53
yes

01:50:53
yes

01:50:54
y

01:50:54
y

01:50:54
yes

01:50:55
y

01:50:55
yes

01:50:56
puppet asks about majors

01:50:58
You might have to find out the partnership agreement for 1NT

01:52:03
x not ok

01:52:22
X may not be openable

01:52:53
on last example, would 2C be accepted?

01:53:12
@Corinna -- yes

01:53:15
Does he have 5 clubs?

01:53:20
are we no longer making bid suffiecient

01:53:25
ever?

01:53:41
a hand that would overcall 2 clubs would tend to open 1 club

01:53:45
That's for insufficient calls, not calls out of rotation

01:53:45
2C is comparable = opening hand with clubs

01:53:53
there is adifference between insufficient bid and a bid out of turn

01:54:02
tu

01:54:10
are you letting the person away from the table whether his proposed replacement bid is comparable?

01:54:38
Talking to the person away from the table is absolutely the best approach

01:54:54
otherswise you may not know what their system and agreements are

01:55:18
It also helps avoid Unauthorized Information

01:55:27
you need to find out what their proposed bid means before they go back to the table

01:55:37
What if the partner of the person who has a withdrawn call, does make an inference from the withdrawn call, and makes a bid not really justified by their hand?

01:55:41
Should the Director determine comparable or not before the substituted call.

01:55:46
Would 2C be comparable to a 1c opening bid? since "double isn't"?

01:55:48
would 1c persision withdrawn be comprble to 1s x

01:56:13
@ Cindy -- yes

01:56:35
the director can find out about the proposed bid and let the player know if it is comparable or not and what the consequences will be before they make the call

01:57:05
most doubles do not show 16+, most precision 1 clubs do--> not comparab;e

01:59:20
so if others bid 6h then no damage?

02:00:32
In her 1H 2NT correction, what if the 1H opening only has 3 hearts in it because they did take in an inference by partner's withdrawn call?

02:01:11
@Corinna, the question is did the offenders only get their because of the opening out of turn and the replacement of a comparable call.

02:03:12
@Vicki if North bid 1H with 3 hearts, they obviously used unauthorized information and the director will need to look at this hand to determine any adjustments

02:03:14
@Corinna, also remember if the call is replaced by a comparable call, there should not be any Unauthorized Information since there should not be any extra information from the withdrawn call. If the partner knows something extra because of the withdrawn call, perhaps the replacement call was not comparable....

02:04:17
need lots of examples. Thank you

02:04:54
how can playing director handle this?

02:05:35
PLayingDirector should give priority to his directing duties, not his playing

02:05:36
Talking to players away from the table is one of the best tools you can adapt. It is a tremendous help for you to learn more without getting others at the table involved or sharing info they shouldn't have ;)

02:05:58
If a playing director receives UI by taking a ruling and learning a lot about a hand, he must bend over backwards to not use that if he has to play the hand later

02:06:44
He might put a sub in, or perhaps give A+ to opponents and not play the hand

02:07:38
Law 26 is very often forgotten when making Call out of Rotation or Insufficient Bid rulings!

02:09:21
d and j

02:09:22
d and h

02:09:23
1 of red suits

02:09:24
diamonds or hearts

02:09:25
H/d

02:09:27
d + h

02:09:27
h

02:09:28
H & D

02:09:29
h and d

02:09:29
Hearts & diamonds

02:09:29
h and d

02:09:29
/d

02:09:31
diamonds or hearts

02:09:31
ds and Hs

02:13:16
3d

02:13:17
3 diamonds

02:13:17
n

02:13:18
no

02:13:18
no

02:13:19
depends

02:13:19
3D

02:13:19
3Ds

02:13:20
depends on system

02:13:20
3D

02:13:20
Y - 3d

02:13:22
3d

02:13:24
no

02:13:24
no

02:13:25
3 dia

02:13:26
3d

02:13:27
yes, usually 3d

02:13:28
3d

02:13:35
leb

02:13:52
y

02:14:09
2NT lebensohl not comparable

02:14:58
You'd want to take offender away from the table and find out if they have a way to bid stayman in which case that bid would be comparable

02:15:13
Can you have an agreement that in this situation, the 3D bid may or may not have a stopper?

02:15:15
Comparable call cannot be a two-step process :)

02:16:05
and if they don”t play leb, but play puppet, can 3c be used?

02:16:07
So is 3C puppet comparable?

02:16:39
@maggi, a director doesn't need to know all conventions. A director needs to be able to ask questions that will explain bids and help them determine if a bid is comparable

02:17:08
3C stayman would be comparable

02:17:13
@maggi don't hesitate to ask players for more info if you aren't familiar with their conventions.

02:17:16
3C puppet stayman also comparable

02:17:33
DON'T leave zoom or you may not be able to get back!!!!!

02:17:34
3 clubs puppet is comparable IF systems on in competition

02:17:40
playing directors should not be permitted

02:17:58
@RonS that is an individual club's choice

02:18:04
any movement discussion?

02:18:07
If possible, at some point I'd like to know how many clubs require evidence of vaccination to play. Could you make a poll? Please?

02:27:15
I saw a club where proof was on an honor system and unvaccinated should wear masks. Are you going there?

02:27:19
the Cruise ships are taking a chance that the ruling will be overturned

02:27:21
You are doing great, Melody

02:27:27
Have been maskless for two weeks

02:27:29
I’m a bridge director not a cop!

02:27:55
Requiring proof puts the director in the position of being a cop. Did not work at our club.

02:28:22
No sou d?

02:28:29
I get Medicare Alert when I call that number!

02:28:42
club hotline is less good for evening games

02:28:56
No sound? Is she muted?

02:29:10
check your sound i can hear her

02:29:24
cant bookmark a link in an umage

02:29:28
If you don't need immediate help, you can write to Rulings@acbl.org with rulings questions

02:30:23
The 855 club hotline number is wrong! Calling this leads to a medical alert promo.

02:30:55
lowell..insufficient rule 27 &35a

02:31:18
We'll double check the number

02:32:00
must SC after posting

02:32:12
Is ACBL score available for a Mac yet?

02:32:16
Any chance for ACBL Score for MAC?

02:32:29
no not availa

02:32:35
for Mac

02:32:41
Too bad

02:32:48
THE PHONE NUMBER FOR HELP IS INCORRECT

02:32:56
we'll get you a good number, stay tuned

02:33:44
662-253-3181

02:34:34
Canadian number please

02:35:08
What was the site to bookmark for results upload?

02:35:20
If a new player joins ACBL after 4 months, do they get credit for all won points?

02:35:21
Emailed Tony at SCORE. He wants us to keep debadding due to the non members playing in the game. It allows non-members to get their points if they join at a later date; at least, this is what I understood.

02:35:37
y

02:35:37
y

02:35:40
yesz

02:35:42
yes

02:35:42
yes

02:35:46
yes

02:35:47
yes

02:35:48
yes

02:35:48
y

02:35:50
yes

02:35:51
y

02:35:54
yes

02:35:54
yes

02:35:55
y

02:35:56
y

02:35:57
yes

02:36:01
Yes

02:36:01
Yes

02:36:03
Should be able to dial 662-253-3191 from Canada.

02:36:04
yes

02:36:05
showing

02:36:10
ly

02:36:21
My function keys don’t work!

02:36:41
try control an f functions

02:36:51
@Victoria try the FN key by alt

02:37:10
Toll free Canadian number try: 1-888-219-9901.

02:37:22
also ctrl-L is the same as F11

02:37:53
@ try holding down Function key and escape

02:38:24
I have players from other districts; so, I enter 00 and it gets all districts.

02:39:08
Is this all in Club mode? If not, please distinguish Club vs Tournament commands

02:39:10
thx for the number

02:39:27
If it's a club game, use Club mode

02:39:49
I just got a chromebook. Does ACBLScore work on a chromebook?

02:40:02
After turning on auto-stratification, are we able to override it?

02:40:20
Upgraded club championships

02:40:30
@Siraj try F11-ST

02:40:49
why want auto stratification?

02:41:04
Chromebook doesn't have windows

02:42:36
855 phonenumber non longer active

02:42:47
For Director help, call 662-253-3181

02:43:13
In Canada: 888-219-9901

02:44:14
ye

02:44:14
y

02:44:15
yes

02:44:16
y

02:45:31
@Linda -- Contact Help@thecommongame.com for questions about common game hands and setting up to use them

02:45:56
why wait? what is the advantage?

02:46:27
Because the number of tables might change up until game time (or ever after) and it saves annoying the bridge mates. They are very easily annoyed.

02:46:55
(I think.)(

02:46:57
LOL

02:47:29
It is correct that if you say, yes and then change the movement, it can cause Bridgemate problems.

02:50:42
the command is SET not EDMOV

02:57:31
If you need Director-ing help outside of business hours, go to BBO, click on "Hosts" from your "people" tab and look for VACB_TD#. They'll be able to help you!

02:58:04
There is someone there almost all the time :)

02:59:26
can you run through the primary start up again??

02:59:41
yes

02:59:42
how do I post my games on live for clubs?

02:59:46
Swiss

02:59:48
How do u change names of players

02:59:52
yes just a quick startup

02:59:55
workshop for ACBL Score-many things I don't know how to do

02:59:57
Posting games is a problem

02:59:57
maybe how to post the game

02:59:59
How to change player names

03:00:00
Live for Clubs is coming up later

03:00:16
jhow do I post scores to acbl.live

03:00:18
I get an error when trying to update database that says “ access violation at address …

03:00:22
@Gerald F3 lets you enter/reenter names

03:00:48
can you show how to change no of stationery pars in a howelll movement example tables -10 pairs with 2 stationery pairs instead of 1 pair

03:01:19
we are experiencing some problems with uploading boards??

03:01:38
you can't change the movement. however, there are workarounds.

03:01:39
results not boards

03:01:52
Live for Clubs upload has known problems. They are working on it.

03:02:30
Does auto-stratify wirk in club mode?

03:02:48
For 10 years, my computer always autostratifies to A = 2000+,B to 500 plus and c = 0 to 500. Can I change my default stratification to b=1000+ so I don't have to manually enter in strat levels each game?

03:03:36
don't yu have to use pick ups if using Bridgemates?

03:03:52
no

03:04:05
Have the second pair sit at a table away from the normal movement of tables. Announce that when a pair gets to a table that is expecting them to play Pair 5 for example, take the boards and the bridgemates to the pair 5 sitting off on the side. Make sure everyone is sitting the right way, play, then bring the bridgemates and boards back to the original table, with boards passed appropriately

03:04:28
how do you submit scores to acbl live

03:04:45
submitting scores coming up in a few minutes

03:04:54
Again, Live for Clubs is coming up.

03:05:20
cats can mute people

03:05:35
That was PERFECT!! Thanks!!!!

03:05:42
Suppose I want to run virtual & live at the same time?

03:06:19
running f2f and virtual simultaneous is okay

03:06:32
if they are both open games, they cannot be combined for scoring

03:06:33
Virtual is not done on ACBLscore. For at least the remainder of 2021 you can run them coincurrent.

03:06:44
yes

03:06:51
if one is open and one is limited, the open can get credit for the limited tables

03:07:11
But that is true. Separate games. Not combined

03:07:56
H8 Rover is great

03:08:06
Howell errors are often about missing arrow switches more than about an actual wrong direction

03:08:20
Pls repeat howell

03:08:51
david, that's where the cell adjustments come in handy!!

03:09:30
Go Brad!

03:09:55
yes

03:09:58
Woo Hoo!!

03:10:06
I miss the stand alone uploader!!

03:12:05
Congrats on Gold Life Master, Brad ;)

03:13:04
They are working on this problem. Hopefully it will be fixed soon!

03:13:15
Bookmark this screen, and you get there every time

03:13:28
I MISS THE STAND-ALONE UPLOADER.

03:13:38
Right click and save that page on desktop

03:14:03
I have a shortcut on Desktop that takes me directly to the upload page.

03:14:27
there is a time limit

03:14:28
Do you need to save the the game to a specific place for use in uploading?

03:14:29
Will ACBL Live now populate to The Common Game?

03:14:55
this is VERY confusing

03:14:57
yesterday did it twice due to time limit

03:15:00
Bookmark that page

03:15:05
Yes, Live sends to Common Game

03:15:12
Thank you. :)

03:15:21
Is there a way to have a short cut on your desktop for ACBL Live?

03:15:36
are multiple Directors able to upload a game to Live for Clubs themselves or do they need to go through one Manager’s MyAcBL only?

03:16:05
If The common game file is moved from the date, you can find it under Archive in the dropbox

03:16:11
To Pam: Not necessary but having files in one folder makes things easier. I use GAMEFILE on our computer.

03:16:33
how did it know club #

03:16:41
Only through Manager's MyACBL

03:16:53
do I have to save the file first?

03:16:56
Isitthe right club automatically

03:17:02
will it pick it from ACBL score?

03:17:04
Yesterday I learnt to do the live for live shortcut and placed it on task bar

03:17:09
thanks, so other Directors must know the Manager’s ACBL information to do upload.

03:17:21
Through my acbl log in

03:17:26
Yes

03:17:37
Isn't the club information embedded in the files you upload?

03:17:47
please try uploading with your link

03:18:08
I entered list of directors for my club and it allows them to upload results

03:18:15
As long as you go through your "My ACBL and get short cuts there it works

03:18:45
Yes got to the upload page using the 2nd method

03:18:55
all directors can upload under their acbl # or just upload by club managers acbl #?

03:21:02
I used Melody's method. It worked as long as I was already logged into My ACBL. If I was not, it would throw me back to that page.

03:21:13
it will pick up the game you upload who will be on your list

03:21:49
what happens if your partner continues to play and plays a card but you are objecting?

03:22:15
@Corinna call the director

03:22:25
club manager can go to "Club Information" and then Edit Directors, they can then upload scores

03:23:37
It was asked if you have to be logged into the Manager's My ACBL account. The answer to that is, no. As long as the Director is registered as a Director for that club. (This is done by the Manager in the Club pages.), this posting can be done through each Director's My ACBL account.

03:24:07
Can dummy give their input in this situation ?

03:24:24
Thanks Brad! I stand corrected! :)

03:25:48
If a player is repeating themselves, it may be that they have nothing else to say and no extra merit

03:26:00
5

03:26:01
good claim

03:26:02
all

03:26:02
5

03:26:03
5

03:26:04
5

03:26:04
dummy cannot contribute at this point. Once everyone else provides info to director dummy can offer any new info or correct what was said. Director will consider all input in making a decision

03:26:05
4

03:26:05
5

03:26:06
5

03:26:09
5

03:26:09
5

03:26:10
4

03:26:11
5

03:26:12
5

03:26:12
5

03:26:12
all

03:26:14
5

03:26:14
valid claim, poorly worded

03:26:17
4

03:26:19
5

03:26:19
4

03:26:19
5

03:26:19
All

03:26:20
5

03:26:22
5 if he leads high

03:26:22
5

03:26:56
4

03:27:00
4

03:27:01
4

03:27:01
4

03:27:02
4

03:27:02
4

03:27:03
4

03:27:05
4

03:27:05
4

03:27:07
4

03:27:07
5

03:27:08
4

03:27:08
4

03:27:08
4

03:27:08
4

03:27:08
5

03:27:09
all

03:27:10
4

03:27:11
all

03:27:12
4

03:27:12
4

03:27:12
5

03:27:12
4

03:27:13
4

03:27:13
4 or 5

03:27:14
Not on desk top in tool bar

03:27:15
4

03:27:16
ye4snoyesyesno5

03:27:18
4

03:27:19
4

03:27:20
5

03:27:21
4

03:27:21
4

03:27:22
4

03:27:23
5

03:27:25
*Open a browser. *Go to ACBL.org * Log into your My ACBL account. Roll down to the bottom of the page and click on "Resources for Clubs" After that opens, choose "Upload Results."

03:27:25
4

03:27:28
4'

03:27:43
4

03:28:00
This seems to reliably bring up the upload page. I have tried it repeatedly and it has worked each time.

03:28:03
doubt goes to nonclaimer

03:29:00
5

03:29:02
5

03:29:03
5

03:29:04
5

03:29:05
5

03:29:06
5

03:29:07
5

03:29:07
Bill Miller 5

03:29:08
5

03:29:08
all

03:29:09
5

03:29:09
5

03:29:13
5

03:29:13
I routinely rule: those who claim carelessly, play carelessly

03:29:14
5

03:29:19
5

03:29:24
5

03:29:26
bookmarked

03:29:39
do opponents ever spcify how cards are played

03:30:24
@Janice -- It's a myth thatopponents can choose what cards declarer has to play. They do not get to "guide" the play

03:30:38
3

03:30:42
zero

03:30:43
3

03:30:43
0

03:30:43
lose em all

03:30:46
0

03:30:47
none

03:30:47
3

03:30:48
0

03:30:48
3

03:30:48
0

03:30:48
3

03:30:50
3

03:30:50
3

03:30:51
3

03:30:52
0

03:30:54
3

03:30:54
0

03:30:55
3

03:30:55
0

03:30:55
0

03:30:55
0

03:30:55
40

03:30:57
0

03:31:48
Thank you so much! I have to go- this was great!

03:31:50
2

03:31:51
1

03:31:52
1

03:31:53
3

03:31:53
2

03:31:54
3

03:31:55
0

03:31:55
1

03:31:57
1

03:31:57
1

03:31:57
3

03:31:57
1

03:32:00
none

03:32:01
0

03:32:01
2

03:32:01
1

03:32:02
1

03:32:02
1

03:32:02
none

03:32:03
0

03:32:03
none

03:32:03
3

03:32:03
none

03:32:03
zero

03:32:04
3

03:32:04
1

03:32:04
1

03:32:04
2

03:32:05
0

03:32:06
0

03:32:06
2

03:32:07
2

03:32:09
0

03:32:12
NONE

03:32:12
2

03:32:13
3

03:32:14
zero

03:32:14
0

03:32:14
2

03:32:24
0

03:32:26
We can't make them be stupid so … They get a spade and a club. 2 tricks. I think.

03:32:49
oh

03:32:54
advice on how to correct a director who does allow opponents to dictate the play?

03:33:11
Show them the Law

03:33:14
Do we assume the best for declarer or worst?

03:33:18
@Janice play elsewhere

03:33:28
Or have them point to the Law which states defenders can dictate play (it does not exist :)

03:33:35
@Fred doubtful points resolved against the claimed

03:33:37
4

03:33:38
4

03:33:40
@Janice, maybe ask them to help you understand the law and ask them if they can show you where it allows that

03:33:40
3

03:33:40
4

03:33:40
3

03:33:43
4

03:33:43
4

03:33:44
3

03:33:44
3

03:33:45
4

03:33:45
4

03:33:45
4

03:33:45
2

03:33:48
4

03:33:48
4

03:33:49
4

03:33:49
4

03:33:49
3

03:33:50
4

03:33:51
4

03:33:52
4

03:33:52
4

03:33:52
4

03:33:54
4

03:33:59
4

03:34:34
On the previous hand, how do you know S thought all trump were out? Couldn’t S think that there was 1 trump out but he had the high trump?

03:35:10
Try asking claimer "Why did you not mention the outstanding trump?"

03:36:47
Oh thanks!

03:37:46
I have less hair so happy with the avitar.

03:40:06
n

03:40:07
no

03:40:08
n

03:40:08
no

03:40:09
which call?

03:40:09
no

03:40:09
No

03:40:10
no

03:40:12
no

03:40:12
no

03:40:13
no

03:40:14
no

03:40:14
n

03:40:15
NO NO NO

03:40:16
no

03:40:16
no

03:40:16
no

03:40:17
yes

03:40:18
no

03:40:18
no

03:40:19
no

03:40:19
no

03:40:20
no

03:40:22
n

03:40:22
it costs extra to change

03:40:22
`n

03:40:23
no

03:40:23
no, could be hsgt

03:40:39
no; lack of focus by S.

03:42:00
lost audio

03:42:02
MUTED

03:42:02
you are muted

03:42:35
lack of concentrations??? lol

03:42:38
Again, questions about the Alert Procedures or other Ruling questions, send an email to Rulings@ACBL.org

03:42:43
we all knew it was Brad ;-)

03:43:11
I got paid a lot of money to hit that mute button.

03:44:38
Short version of changes to Alert Procedures: https://bridgefeed.acbl.org/red-alert/

03:44:48
Are artificial preempts below 3NT allowed?

03:45:09
Yes, on Open+ Chart

03:45:19
This refers to Multi-2D for example

03:46:51
Do not play Stayman yes / no aleart

03:47:08
FYI, "short club" does not require a Pre-Alert (your players will ask!). So if they only open 1C with two clubs with specifically 4-4-3-2 shape no pre-alert s required. An announcement at the time the bid is made of "could be 2" is required.

03:47:30
thank you Lynn

03:47:36
No Alert is required for a natural 2C bid in an auction such as 1NT-(P)-2C

03:47:57
1C - P - P - 1NT shows 11-14 alertable?

03:48:01
If you play Flannery and also 1H:1NT as semi--forcing, you still hsve to say "may have 4 s?", right?

03:48:05
So the unusual 2 NT is not alertable, but Michaels is alertable?

03:48:48
thank you so much. much leave. WonderfuL!!

03:49:09
not alertable; but can opps ask for an explanaton

03:49:40
can only ask at your turn

03:50:02
what about strong jump shifts

03:50:06
Does 1C that could be 2 require both prevalent and announcement?

03:50:15
can she go back 2 screens?

03:50:22
is the Spiral 2NT alertable?

03:51:00
Spiral is alertable as Forcing vs natural 2NT is passable

03:52:36
can you please show screen of when no alerts are necessary?

03:53:05
everyone should get a pdf of the slides

03:53:09
very good

03:53:23
Lots of questions about these, with everything going quickly. You will get copies to look at in more detail

03:53:48
This was wonderful, thank you

03:53:56
minimum points to open weak two or 3

03:55:41
his partner does not know he has a minor

03:55:46
That east doesn't have a minor

03:56:04
how do we know it is hearts+minor?

03:56:12
no

03:56:16
non

03:56:17
no

03:56:19
If your questions in chat doesnot get answered, please write to Rulings@ACBL.org

03:56:20
No

03:56:21
OK

03:56:21
no

03:56:27
we don't know, but north knows

03:56:28
no

03:58:55
This does not give the offended side the right to make a clear-cut bridge blunder.

04:01:06
y

04:01:08
yes

04:01:11
his last call was forcing to 3 hearts

04:01:11
yes

04:01:42
no

04:01:46
yes

04:01:46
no

04:01:46
yes

04:01:49
yes

04:01:49
no

04:01:51
maybe with a diamond void

04:01:51
no

04:01:54
Violation

04:01:59
As a beginning director this was a bit overwhelming to me. Could you have shorter sessions with less info for us. Scoring only. Just one or two laws at a time

04:02:48
Thanks Beth. We'll make sure this is considered in future.

04:02:49
no

04:03:08
no

04:03:45
can the opener to the C bidder, who later bids 3H, can opener carry on to game?

04:06:36
Did not understand the 1h - p - 3c - 3d, p - p - 4h example. North has less information that she would have had if South had not screwed up. North does not have UI, just less info than she should have.

04:06:38
Are support doubles and redbles alertable now?

04:06:49
Is this true on defense? A frown and a defense switch?

04:06:49
no

04:07:37
two heads are better than one

04:07:45
I agree with Beth Howe. Can we have a few shorter sessions on the more difficult sections?

04:07:53
Support doubles and redoubles were alertable but, as of Jan 1st (ie 6 months ago), they no longer are.

04:09:03
the 3C bidder had a limit raise, not a game going raise. So he is allowed to continue to bid 3H, the suit he was bidding all along, but his hand never intended to bid 4H, that was up to partner who passed.

04:09:35
THANK YOU!!

04:09:37
What you rule here: 1H P 1NT (alert forcing) P P; the player who passed assuming that there would be another bid is harmed

04:09:38
It can feel overwhelming. Sometimes, if it feels that way, think about the concept--the generality--rather than the specifics she is talking about. That might guide you to finding the answers.

04:09:44
thank you

04:09:56
everyone will get a link to the video --

04:09:57
This was awesome. Thank you so much for putting this together.

04:10:10
Thank you good esetatiom Santa Barbara

04:10:13
Thank you that was fantastic!

04:10:14
thank you Melody. This was a great review for me.

04:10:28
Thank you so much: I had no invitation

04:10:29
Is ACBL going to disband the virtual multiplier and stacking to help club games?

04:10:31
Thank you Melody!!

04:10:36
Good stuff. I might get some calls right, now

04:10:36
Thanks Melody! This was awesome!

04:10:38
Thanks Melody. I hope you can repeat for those who missed

04:10:38
Great job, Melody, thank you

04:10:39
THANK YOU

04:10:39
Thank you!!! Very helpful.

04:10:41
thank you for all this!

04:10:44
This was GREAT - Thanks

04:10:50
Thanks so much -

04:10:50
July 1st the multiplier goes to 125%

04:10:52
Thanks you very much for presenting today:)

04:10:54
Thank you very helpful

04:11:01
Thank you , Melody!

04:11:03
ty melody

04:11:04
Thsnk ypu

04:11:07
Have people raise hand to ask questions

04:11:07
Thank you!!

04:11:09
Great job, Melody!

04:11:12
Thanks Melody Well done very informative. Bye

04:11:17
Thank you, Melody!

04:11:20
You shaved.

04:11:21
If possible, at some point I'd like to know how many clubs require evidence of vaccination to play. Could you make a poll? Please?

04:11:23
Hope Greg did not sneak out to smoke

04:11:37
Yeah

04:11:43
Yay! Congrats Greg!

04:11:46
Thank you Melody and your team.

04:11:47
Wonderful Melody!

04:11:47
Thank you, Melody!

04:11:53
For help call: 662-253-3181 for US and other countries888-219-9901 for Canada (toll free) during business hours

04:11:56
Keep it going Greg!!!

04:12:13
Thanks for for a wonderful update .

04:12:18
people can raise hands

04:12:35
raise in reactions

04:12:37
From Bill Miller

04:12:37
thank you for the review

04:12:40
Can we all agree that we have wasted too much time and money on patching ACBL Score? Is there a plan to do something about it?

04:12:48
I could not get in initially because I didn't know the zoom session was limited to 500 people. I got in in the middle. Would I be able to view what I had missed in the beginning?

04:12:57
Thanks Melody it was great.

04:13:00
thank you .. tremendous.

04:13:02
Lots of info with directors at various levels of experience... so don't worry if it was confusing at times. The links will give you a chance to review at your pace

04:13:12
Some of us have been working on alternatives to ACBLScore for several years. Waiting for ACBL to approve.

04:13:28
Link to recording will be provided and the pdf presentation.

04:13:28
Are there plans for on-line Masterpoints to be deeply discounted from LIVE Masterpoints in the future? Like 2022?

04:13:52
What do we do about sanction in Acbl score for extra games you are allowing us to have in the face to face games?

04:14:15
there was a slide earlier which said alert needed

04:14:16
We greatly appreciate all the thank yous, but let's please use the chat just for questions. Thank you!!

04:14:21
it was discussed opening 1NT and 2NT with a small singleton is an alert

04:14:33
That was 1 of the things you mentioned as alertable.

04:14:59
you must unmute to talk

04:15:25
a partnership agreement that they can open 2NT with small singleton is alertable, one bad bid is not alertable

04:15:25
We cannot unmute ourselves

04:15:36
When and where can I see the whole session?

04:15:45
in regards Laws of Duplicate Bridge, is the 2017 version latest one?

04:16:02
evidence required

04:16:11
Bridge Gallery requiring proof

04:16:15
it says the Host insn't allowing people to unmurte themselves

04:16:17
vaccinations mandatory at our club but I accept one's word

04:16:21
you can do a quick poll using zoom now

04:16:26
PABC requiring

04:16:32
email with links to presentation will be sent out to everyone who got the original email invitations

04:16:40
Our club (NY) requires proof, but that is he rule of the facility we use.

04:16:41
yes vaccinations will be required

04:16:43
not requiring vaccine since it is against a privacy law in North Carolina

04:16:45
Columbia Bridge Club is not requiring vaccination proof

04:16:50
2 in MEMPHIS requiring vaccination proof. 1 is not requiring

04:16:59
LDBC in GA proof of vaccine

04:17:03
city of long beach require an downey club reuires, proof both clubs

04:17:05
@Jack Yes

04:17:11
Not legal to ask in FL

04:17:14
All the clubs in Sri-cities area of TN require proof

04:17:29
Are unit Bridge Centers required to have proof of vax

04:17:39
What would you rule here: 1H P 1NT (alert forcing P P: and the player who passed assumed that there would be another bid is harmed

04:17:54
My players won't come unless proof of vax

04:17:55
New Orleans club requires proof.

04:18:16
Duncan requires,.but is on Honor system because Bridge is an Honorable game :)

04:18:31
Indianapolis Club requires Proof

04:18:37
2NT with small singleton legal except in games governed by the Basic Chart

04:18:42
@Papa -- is it on the convention cards? is yes, no adjustment

04:18:52
I saw the. Email from Duncan. They don’t require. You have to wear a mask if not vaccinated

04:19:04
I know our members well enough, I accept their word. Maybe that is foolish

04:19:12
@Papa -- you need to talk to them about their agreement. It's likely they know that the 1NT is limited to no more than 11 points in which case it should have been alerted as semi-forcing

04:19:28
IT's not forcing if they know it's limited to 11 points

04:19:43
do we know when ACBL will be sending directors out to do tournaments.

04:20:08
There are TDs assigned to sectionals starting in Auguest

04:20:22
What do you select in ACBL score for these special games

04:20:56
In ACBL score you select club championship or upgraded club championship rather than 'club game'

04:21:12
What is the point of requiring vaccination? If you are not vaccinated YOU are the one at risk. You NOT being vaccinated does not put others at risk

04:21:12
Palm Beach Gardens Tournament August in Florida! Yay!

04:21:24
We may have missed some of your questions in chat. If you have a Ruling or Alert Procedures question, please send it to Rulings@ACBL.org

04:22:30
Did I hear correctly about someone opening 2NT with a small singleton is legal as where opening 1NT with a small singleton is illegal.

04:22:32
Will the San Antonio tournament require vaccinations and masks, or will the new Texas law make that not possible?

04:22:46
@Mark -- correct

04:23:26
It is legal to open 2NT with a small singleton except in events governed by the Basic Chart (generally beginner/intermediate games)

04:23:50
thank you

04:23:58
has to do with the math of sitouts

04:24:10
You must alert opening No Trump bid that is natural but always based on a long suit

04:24:30
That's an artificial NT opening bid

04:24:32
good toknow

04:24:38
solution is more digits

04:24:57
why can't ACBL score be fixed

04:25:22
help@thecommongame.com

04:25:29
ACBLscor can be fixed. But not at a reasonable cost

04:25:44
This is what happens when you try to reinvent the wheel.

04:26:47
I missed the first hour, when will the recording be available? Will it be posted on the acbl web site?

04:26:51
Everyone is at risk when someone is not vaccinated because that person can contract a mutation of the virus that can mutate again until vaccinations will no longer be effective.

04:27:22
@Mark - Everyone who received an invitation to this will get the email including the recording.

04:27:23
Please clariify if club can hold online games and in club games on the same day.

04:27:32
Let third party scoring programs submit files to ACBL, rather than fixing ancient ACBLScore.

04:27:34
Yes, clubs can do both

04:27:37
@Fay - Yes

04:28:06
online concurrant with in person is permitted -- NO aggregation of masterpoints

04:28:12
they can even do them at the same time, but opne f2f cannot combine with a virtual open game

04:28:21
they would be considered separate games

04:28:43
beyond the scope of this presentation

04:29:11
There are discussions about what clubs are doing on bridgewinners.com

04:29:13
Thank you Melody. Terrific

04:29:34
an open game can get credit for a limited game even when one is virtual and one is f2f

04:29:55
When both are within the same club number

04:30:16
July 1

04:30:24
What Bradley said! :)

04:30:29
what about allowing silver or gold points or red for club games

04:30:58
colored points in clubs are not currently being offeredn

04:31:01
Will we still be allowed to have the regular Club Championship game per session on top of the extras?

04:31:39
@Lou yes

04:31:49
Yes, regular club champioinships are still available

04:31:50
Good question

04:32:14
so you can get 8 additional weeks on top of the quarterly championships allowed

04:32:47
The email to club managers had that info only if you read the attached PowerPoint slides.

04:32:49
Thank you Melody!!! Great presentation!!!

04:33:07
Thank you so much!

04:33:10
Thank you Melody. You did a grand job!

04:33:11
thank you Melody

04:33:12
Thank you so much!

04:33:13
Thanks Melody!

04:33:15
Does the "LT" hack continue?

04:33:15
thank you

04:33:17
See you all at tournaments soon

04:33:19
You too Greg!

04:33:19
Thank you. Good review.

04:33:19
Thank you for organizing this class. It was great!

04:33:20
:)

04:33:24
I am not sure the email went out this week> I didn't receive it.

04:33:27
Thank you everyone

04:33:29
thank you!

04:33:51
Thanks so much.

04:33:54
I think they run on youtube

04:33:57
Thank you so much! This was terrific1

04:33:58
great review

04:33:59
If you have additional questions about the extra incentives regarding the return to face-to-face, email club@acbl.org

04:34:01
Why make the video a secret?

04:34:08
Thank you all

04:34:10
I found them on ACBL and watched them on yourtube

04:34:11
Just put in on youtube